A finite element comparison between two sizes of NiTi commercial staples used in scaphoid fracture fixation

Keywords

bone fracture, bone healing, shape memory NiTi alloy, staple, finite element, scaphoid, simulation.

Cite as

Majd M. Kh., Bahrami M., Nouri A., and Nazarpak M. H. A finite element comparison between two sizes of NiTi commercial staples used in scaphoid fracture fixation. Physicochemical Mechanics of Materials. 2023. 59(1), 112-120.

https://doi.org/10.15407/pcmm2023.01.112

Abstract

Most carpal bone fractures occur in the scaphoid. This work is aimed at finding the most suitable size of NiTi shape memory alloy (nitinol) staples to heal scaphoid fractures by comparing two commercially available compression staples (DynaClip™ Bone Fixation System, 10×10 and 14×14 mm). In the present study the scaphoid bone was selected for si­mulating a model in SolidWorks software. To accurately investigate the effect of staple size on the bone the scaphoid was assumed to be a three-layer composite structure con­sisting of collagen and mineral crystals. The stress distributions along a path located at the waist of the scaphoid were assessed. The finite element analysis was carried out in ABAQUS software based on the nitinol staple shape memory effect and super-elasticity behavior. The results indicated that the smaller size of staples induced a more significant stress on the central zone of the scaphoid, whereas the larger size of staples showed a peak stress concentration on the peripheral zones with a reduced stress concentration at the center. Hence, it is suggested to utilize the two of these staples in different orientations or in parallel with each other to improve the biomechanical behavior of the regenerated bone.

References

1. A. F. Saleeb, S. A. II Padula, and A. Kumar, “A multi-axial, multimechanism based constitutive model for the comprehensive representation of the evolutionary response of SMAs under general thermomechanical loading conditions,” Int. J. of Plasticity, 27, Is. 5, 655-687 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.012
2. J. Klaput, “Studies of selected mechanical properties of NiTinol shape memory alloy,” Archiv. of Foundry Eng., 10, Is. 3, 155-158 (2010).
3. F. Hatira and K. Saidane, “A Thermo-Mechanical Behavior Simulation of A NiTi Staple Used for the Correction of Idiopathic Scoliosis,” J. of Biomat. and Nanobiotechn., 3, No. 1, 61-69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2012.31008
4. A. Concilio, and L. Lecce, Shape Memory Alloy Engineering: For Aerospace, Structural and Biomedical Applications(1st ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann (2014).
5. X. M. Wang, P. Liu, H. Liang, M. C. Zhang, L. Li, and Z. F. Yue, “Analysis of the whole implementation process and optimization of a Nitinol superelastic stent [Analyse des gesamten Implementierungsprozesses und der Optimierung eines superelastischen Stents aus einer NiTi-Formgedächtnislegierung],” Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 50, Is. 1, 44-51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201800066
6. M. Gannoun, M. L. Hellara, C. Bouby, T. Ben Zineb, and T. Bouraoui, “Numerical simulation of the force generated by a superelastic NiTi orthodontic archwire during tooth alignment phase: Comparison between different constitutive models,” Mat. Res. Express, 5, Is. 4 (2018). Article number 045405. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaba4d
7. J. C. Wu, A. Mills, K. D. Grant, and P. J. Wiater, “Fracture fixation using shape-memory (ninitol) staples,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 50, Is. 3, 367-374 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.002
8. S. M. Russell, “Design considerations for nitinol bone staples,” J. of Mat. Eng. and Performance, 18, Iss. 5-6, 831-835 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-009-9402-1
9. T. M. Salameh, “Performance of existing bone staples for treatment of fractures,” Master thesis, Clevland State University (2020).
10. L. Claes, and C. Heigele, “Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing,” J. of Biomechanics, 32, Is. 3, P. 255-266 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00153-5
11. S. Görlitz, “The role of mechanical forces in osteogenic differentiation, BMP signaling and early tissue formation processes in the context of bone healing,” PhD thesis, Technische Universitaet Berlin (2021).
12. A. Roshan-Ghias, F. M. Lambers, M. Gholam-Rezaee, R. Müller, and D. P. Pioletti, “In vivo loading increases mechanical properties of scaffold by affecting bone formation and bone resorption rates,” Bone, 49, Is. 6, 1357-1364 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.040
13. J. D. Boerckel, Y. M. Kolambkar, H. Y. Stevens, A. S. Lin, K. M. Dupont, and R. E. Guldberg, “Effects of in vivo mechanical loading on large bone defect regeneration,” J. of Orthopaedic Res., 30, Is. 7, 1067-1075 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22042
14. J. Fritton, E. Myers, T. Wright, and M. Vandermeulen, “Loading induces site-specific increases in mineral content assessed by microcomputed tomography of the mouse tibia,” Bone, 36, Is. 6, 1030-1038 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.02.013
15. V. A. Stadelmann, J. Hocké, J. Verhelle, V. Forster, F. Merlini, A. Terrier, and D. P. Pioletti, “3D strain map of axially loaded mouse tibia: a numerical analysis validated by experimental measurements,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Eng., 12, Is. 1, 95-100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840802178053
16. R. L. De Souza, M. Matsuura, F. Eckstein, S. C. Rawlinson, L. E. Lanyon, and A. A. Pitsillides, “Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: A new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element,” Bone, 37, Is. 6, P. 810-818 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.022
17. S. Nomura, and T. Takano-Yamamoto, “Molecular events caused by mechanical stress in bone,” Matrix Biology, 19, Is. 2, 91-96 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00050-0
18. S. Ghimire, S. Miramini, G. Edwards, R. Rotne, J. Xu, P. Ebeling, and L. Zhang, “The investigation of bone fracture healing under intramembranous and endochondral ossification,” Bone reports, 14 (2021). Article number. 100740 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100740
19. DYNACLIP – Djo Global. https://www.djoglobal.com/sites/default/files/DynaClip%20Procedure%20Guide_Rebranded.pdf.
20. H. Kakizawa, N. Toyota, Y. Akiyama, Y. Kijima, O. Ishida, and K. Ito, “A three-dimensional laminated paper model of the scaphoid from computed tomography,” Acta Radiol., 48, Is.1, 80-88 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850601026419
21. J.-Y. Rho, L. Kuhn-Spearing, and P. Zioupos, “Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone,” Medical Eng. and Phys., 20, Is. 2, 92-102 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00007-1
22. T. Vaughan, C. McCarthy, and L. McNamara, “A three-scale finite element investigation into the effects of tissue mineralization and lamellar organization in human cortical and trabecular bone,” J. of the Mech. Behavior of Biomedical Mat., 12, 50-62 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.003
23. M. J. Steffes, J. H. Wang, D. D. Adams, J. Yao, D. Johnson, P. J. Evans, and P. J. Evans, “Scaphoid Fracture – Hand – Orthobullets,” Orthobullets (2021).
24. P. Y. Zhou, L. Q. Jiang, D. M. Xia, J. H. Wu, Y. Ye, and S. G. Xu, “Nickel-titanium arched shape-memory alloy connector combined with bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion,” European J. of Medical Res., 24, Is. 1 (2019). Article number 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0380-y
25. M. D. Ahrend, T. Teunis, H. Noser, F. Schmidutz, G. Richards, B. Gueorguiev, and L. Kamer, “3D computational anatomy of the scaphoid and its waist for use in fracture treatment,” J. of Orthopaedic Surgery and Res., 16, Is. 1 (2021). Article number 216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02330-8
26. R. B. Ashman, and Rho Jae Young, “Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material,” J. Biomech., 21, Is. 3, 177-181 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90167-4
27. R. Mehrabi, M. Dorri, and M. Elahinia, “Finite element simulation of NiTi umbrella-shaped implant used on femoral head under different loadings,” Bioengineering, 42, Is. 1 (2017). Article number 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010023
28. R. Marsell, and T. A. Einhorn, “The biology of fracture healing,” Injury, 42, Is. 6, 551-555 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031
29. M. J. Gardner, M. C. van der Meulen, D. Demetrakopoulos, T. M. Wright, E. R. Myers, and M. P. Bostrom, “In vivo cyclic axial compression affects bone healing in the mouse tibia,” J. of Orthopaedic Res.: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Res. Soc., 24, Is. 8, 1679-1686 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20230
30. S. Nomura, and T. Takano-Yamamoto, “Molecular events caused by mechanical stress in bone,” Matrix Biology, 19, Is. 2, 91-96 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00050-0
31. G. Laros, “Fracture healing: compression vs fixation,” Archives of Surgery, 108, Is. 5, 698-702 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1974.01350290062010
32. Q. C. J. Hoon, M. H. Pelletier, C. Christou, K. A. Johnson, and W. R. Walsh, “Biomechanical evaluation of shape-memory alloy staples for internal fixation – an in vitro study,” J. Exp. Ortop., 3, Is. 1 (2016). Article number 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-016-0055-3