Modelling of aluminum powder densification kinetics during electric pulse consolidation

Keywords

aluminum, spark plasma sintering, densification kinetics, current super¬posi¬tion, energy efficiency.

Cite as

Syzonenko O. M., Prystash M. S., Torpakov A. S., and Makrukha T. O. Modelling of aluminum powder densification kinetics during electric pulse consolidation. Physicochemical Mechanics of Materials. 2026. 62(4), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.15407/pcmm2026.04.015

Abstract

The comparative results of densification kinetics of aluminium powder (grade PA1, d₀ = 21 mm) were obtained under four current modes – direct current, alternating (50 Hz), pulsed (1 kHz), and their superposition – over a current range of 400…800 A and compac­tion pressures of 20–50 MPa. It is shown that DC provides the highest heating rates (up to 15.26°C/s at 800 A) but proves to be the most energy-intensive mode, consuming up to 0.726 kJ. It is established that pulsed current at 1 kHz provides a relative density of 0.98 at 800 A and 50 MPa while maintaining safe heating rates. The hybrid superposition mode of DC and pulsed components is technologically optimal: the synergistic action of both me­chanisms yields a relative density of 0.985 at minimum energy consumption of 0.367 kJ. It is shown that densification kinetic curves exhibit a sigmoidal (S-shaped) profile regardless of current type, and experimental validation on real aluminium compacts confirmed the theoretical predictions.

 

References

1. J. Wu, X. Wu, Y. Gao, Z. Yan, “Innovations in electric current-assisted sintering for SOFC: A review of advances in flash sintering and ultrafast high-temperature sintering,” Appl. Sci., 14, Art. no. 3953 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14103953
2. Y. Le Godec, S. Le Floch, “Recent developments of high-pressure spark plasma sintering: an overview of current applications, challenges and future directions,” Materials, 16, Art. no. 997 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030997
3. Spark Plasma Sintering Systems. Dr. Sinter Lab Series: product catalog // SPS Syntex Inc. – Kawasaki, 2023. – 12 p.
4. Field Assisted Sintering Technology (FAST) / Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): systems specification // FCT Systeme GmbH. – Rauenstein, 2022. – 8 p.
5. Gleeble 3800 Physical Simulation System: user guide / Dynamic Systems Inc. – Poestenkill, NY, 2019. – 45 p.
6. O. Syzonenko, M. Prystash, A. Zaichenko, O. Kovalenko, “Peculiarities of the structure formation of materials of Al-Cu and Al-Cu-C systems under the conditions of sparkplasma sintering,” Mater. Sci. Non-Equilibrium Phase Transformations, 4, 2, 41-44 (2018).
7. T. Nagae, M. Yokota, M. Nose, S. Tomida, T. Kamiya, S. Saji, “Effects of pulse current on an aluminum powder oxide layer during pulse current pressure sintering,” Mater. Transact., 43, 6, 1390-1397 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.1390
8. O. Syzonenko, M. Prystash, A. Torpakov, T. Makrukha, “Modeling of densification kinetics during electro-pulse consolidation of titanium powder,” Machines. Technol. Maters., 20, 3, 103-107 (2026).
9. E.A. Olevsky, “Theory of sintering: from discrete to continuum,” Mater. Sci. & Eng. R-reports, 23, 2, 41-100 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(98)00009-6
10. S. Grasso, Y. Sakka, G. Maizza, “Electric current activated/assisted sintering (ECAS): A review of patents 1906-2008,” Sci. and Technol. of Adv. Mater., 10, 5, Art. no. 053001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/10/5/053001