The influence of specific features of load and hydrogenation on steels tribotechnical properties

Keywords

dry friction, rolling friction, slip, high-nitrogen steel, structural steel, wear products, hydrogenation.

Cite as

Balitskii O. I., Kolesnikov V. O., Ivaskevych L. M., and Havryliuk M. R. The influence of specific features of load and hydrogenation on steels tribotechnical properties. Physico-chemical Mechanics of Materials. 2022. 58(4), 073-080.

Abstract

Wear resistance of structural steels 20; 45 and high-nitrogen DDT 68 during dry friction under different load conditions has been studied. It is found that with an increase in slip to 20% at a load of 550 N, the wear intensity increases 1.41 times for high-nitrogen steel and 1.54 times for structural steel. In sliding, the surface fractures by tear of the material under conditions of intense thermal setting, which affects the formation of secondary structures that contain an increased concentration of oxygen. With the reliability approximation of R₂ = 0.87–0.99 logarithmic and polynomial equations are obtained that describe the wear intensity in the conditions of change of the slip and loading of the studied steels. After hydrogenation, the wear products have a significantly more complex textured microrelief with strips and larger dimensions: ≥350 μm (P = 250 N), 600…1000 μm (P = 400 N), 800…1300 μm (P = 600 N).

References

1. H. Lin, M. Yang, and B. Shu, “Fretting wear behaviour of high-nitrogen stainless bearing steel under lubrication condition,” J. of Iron and Steel Res. Int., 27, Is. 7, 849–866 (2020).
2. S. V. Rashev, A. V. Eliseev, L. Ts. Zhekova, and P. V. Bogev, “High-nitrogen steel,” Steel in Translation, 49, Is. 7, 433–439 (2019).
3. A. Upadhye, N. Shah, P. K. Lalge, N. Dhokey, and T. Tharian, “Evolution of ultrafine precipitates and its influence on wear mechanism in cryoprocessed high nitrogen martensitic steel,” Tribology – Mater. Surf. & Interfaces, 13, Is. 4, 233–229 (2019).
4. V. V. Kulyk, S. Ya. Shipitsyn, O. P. Ostash, Z. A. Duriagina, and V. V. Vira, “The joint effect of vanadium and nitrogen on the mechanical behavior of railroad wheels steel,” J. of Achiev. in Mater. and Manufact. Eng., 89, Is. 2, 56–63 (2018).
5. O. I. Balyts’kyi, and V. O. Kolesnikov, “Investigation of wear products of high-nitrogen manganese steels,” Mater. Sci., 45, No. 4, 576–581 (2009).
6. O. I. Balyts’kyi, V. O. Kolesnikov, and J. Eliasz, “Study of the wear resistance of high-nitrogen steels under dry sliding friction,” Mater. Sci., 48, No. 5, 642–646 (2013).
7. O. I. Balyts’kyi, V. O. Kolesnikov, J. Eliasz, M. R. Havrylyuk, “Specific features of the fracture of hydrogenated high-nitrogen manganese steels under conditions of rolling friction,” Mater. Sci., 50, No. 4, 604–611 (2015).
8. Y.-S. Lee, S. Yamagishi, M. Tsuro, C. Ji, S. Cho, Y. Kim, and M. Choi, “Wear behaviors of stainless steel and lubrication effect on transitions in lubrication regimes in sliding contact,” Metals, 11, Is. 11, Article number: 1854, (2021).
9. W. W. Seifert, and W. C. Westcott, “A method for the study of wear particles in lubricating oil,” Wear, 21, Is. 1, 27–42 (1972).
10. I. M. Dmytrakh, R. L. Leshchak, and A. M. Syrotyuk, “Experimental study of low concentration diffusible hydrogen effect on mechanical behaviour of carbon steel,” Struct. Integrity, 16, 32–37 (2020).
11. V. I. Tkachev, L. M. Ivaskevich, and I. M. Levina, “Distinctive features of hydrogen degradation of heat-resistant alloys based on nickel,” Mater. Sci., 33, No. 4, 524–531 (1997).
12. V. Hutsaylyuk, M. Student, V. Dovhunyk, V. Posuvailo, O. Student, P. Maruschak, and I. Koval’chuck, “Effect of hydrogen on the wear resistance of steels upon contact with plasma electrolytic oxidation layers synthesized on aluminum alloys,” Metals, 9, Is. 3, Article number: 280 (2019).
13. A. I. Balitskii, and L. M. Ivaskevich, “Assessment of hydrogen embrittlement in high-alloy chromium-nickel steels and alloys in hydrogen at high pressures and temperatures,” Strength Mater., 50, No. 6, 880–887 (2018).
14. I. G. Slys, V. I. Berezanskaya, I. A. Kossko, and A. P. Pomytkin, “Development of new corrosion-resistant and wear-resistant materials for use in agressive hydrogen medium,” Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 26, Is. 5, 531–536 (2001).
15. Yu. I. Osenin, I. I. Sosnov, A. V. Chesnokov, L. I. Antoshkina, and Yu. Yu. Osenin, “Friction unit of a disc brake based on a combination of friction materials,” J. of Friction and Wear, 40, Is. 4, 293–296 (2019).
16. V. I. Pokhmurs’kyi, and Kh. B. Vasyliv, “Influence of hydrogen on the friction and wear of metals (a survey),” Mater. Sci., 48, No. 2, 125–138 (2012).
17. D. Banks, and P. Clayton, “Comparison of the wear process for eutectoid rail steels: field and laboratory tests,” Wear, 120, 233–250 (1987).
18. P. Clayton, “Predicting the wear of rails on curves from laboratory data. Part 1,” Wear, 181–183, 11–19 (1995).
19. B. K. Prasad, “Sliding wear response of spheroidal graphite cast iron as influenced by applied pressure, sliding speed and test environment,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 47, Is. 4, 495–508 (2008).
20. M. B. Djukic, G. M. Bakic, Z. V. Sijacki, A. Sedmak, and B. Rajicic, “The synergistic action and interplay of hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms in steels and iron: localized plasticity and decohesion,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 216, Article number: 106528 (2019).
21. O. P. Datsyshyn, V. V. Panasyuk, and A. Glazov, “Modeling of fatigue contact damages formation in rolling bodies and assessment of their lifetime,” Wear, 271, Is. 1–2, 186–194 (2011).
22. O. Barrera, D. Bombac, Y. Chen, T. D. Daff, E. Galindo-Nava, P. Gong, D. Haley, R. Horton, I. Katzarov, J. R. Kermode, C. Liverani, M. Stopher, and F. Sweeney, “Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: a review of experimental, modelling and design progress from atomistic to continuum,” J. of Mater. Sci., 53, Is. 9, 6251–6290 (2018).
23. M. Dadfarnia, A. Nagao, S. Wang, and M. L. Martin, “Recent advances on hydrogen embrittlement of structural materials,” Int. J. of Fract., 196, Is. 1–2, 223–243 (2015).
24. S. Lynch, “Hydrogen embrittlement phenomena and mechanisms,” Corr. Rev., 30, Is. 3–4, 105–123 (2012).
25. L. R. Queiroga, G. F. Marcolino, M. Santos, G. Rodrigues, C. E. dos Santos, and P. Brito, “Influence of machining parameters on surface roughness and susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement of austenitic stainless steels,” Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 44, Is. 54, 29027–29033 (2019).
26. V. N. Kulkarni, V. K. Jain, and A. K. Shukla, “Measurement of hydrogen content in electrical discharge machined components,” Machining Sci. and Tech. An Int. J., 9, Is. 2, 289–299 (2005).
27. T. Michler, and J. Naumann, “Hydrogen embrittlement of Cr–Mn–N-austenitic stainless steels,” Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 35, Is. 3, 1485–1492 (2010).
28. A. I. Balitskii, L. M. Ivaskevich, V. M. Mochulskyi, J. Eliasz, and O. Skolozdra, “Influence of high pressure and high temperature hydrogen on fracture toughness of Ni-containing steels and alloys,” Arch. of Mech. Eng., 61, Is. 1, 129–138 (2014).
29. M. H. Stashchuk, and M. Dorosh, “Evaluation of hydrogen stresses in metal and redistribution of hydrogen around crack-like defects,” Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 37, Is. 19, 14687–14696 (2012).
30. V. V. Panasyuk, Ya. L. Ivanyts’kyi, O. V. Hembara, and V. M. Boiko, “Influence of the stress-strain state on the distribution of hydrogen concentration in the process zone,” Mater. Sci., 50, No. 3, 315–323 (2014).
31. I. Dmytrakh, A. Syrotyuk, and R. Leshchak, “Specific mechanism of hydrogen influence on deformability and fracture of lowalloyed pipeline steel,” Proc. Struct. Integrity, 36, 298–305 (2022).
32. J. Capelle, J. Gilgert, I. Dmytrakh, and G. Pluvinage, “The effect of hydrogen concentration on fracture of pipeline steels in presence of a notch,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 78, Is. 2, 364–373 (2011)