Corrosion fatigue endurance of steel 45 after surface nanostructuring by mechanical pulse treatment in different environments

Keywords

nanocrystalline structure, medium carbon steel, fatigue, corrosion fatigue, residual stresses.

Cite as

Kyryliv V. I., Maksymiv O. V., Zvirko О. І., Tsizh B. R., and Kyryliv Ya. B. Corrosion fatigue endurance of steel 45 after surface nanostructuring by mechanical pulse treatment in different environments. Physicochemical Mechanics of Materials. 2024. 60(4), 115-120.

https://doi.org/10.15407/pcmm2024.04.115

Abstract

The influence of the technological environment (TE) during the formation of a nanocrys­talline structure (NCS) on the normalized carbon steel 45 by mechanical pulse treatment (MPT) on the parameters of the NCS and resistance to multicycle fatigue and corrosion-fatigue failure in a 3% NaCl aqueous solution was investigated. On the specimens, a sur­face layer with a ferritic-austenitic NCS and a ferrite grain size of 14 and 23 nm was obtained after MPT in mineral oil and air, respectively. It was established that the fatigue endurance of steel with NCS is significantly higher than that without a surface treated layer, and practically does not depend on the type of applied TE during MPT. The highest resistance to corrosion fatigue is characterized by steel with a surface NCS formed by MPT in oil. The obtained results were analyzed taking into account the NCS characteris­tics, the microhardness of the strengthened layer, the distribution of residual stresses and chemical elements (Н, N, C and O).

References

1. T. O. Olugbade, and J. Lu, “Literature review on the mechanical properties of materials after surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT),” Nano Mater. Sci., 2, 3-31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.04.002
2. T. Grosdidier, and M. Novelli, “Recent developments in the application of surface mechanical attrition treatments for improved gradient structures: Processing parameters and surface reactivity,” Mater. Trans., 60, Is. 7, 1344-1355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MF201929
3. T. Balusamy, P. M. Sathyaraj, K. Racichandran, and T. S. N. S. Narayanan, “Influence of surface mechanical attrition treatment parameters on the residual stress of EN8 steel,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 5, 1-10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09521-4
4. M. Bembenek, V. Kopei, L. Ropyak, and K Levchuk, “Stressed state of chrome partes during diamond burnishing,” Metallofizika i Noveishiye Tekhnologii [in Russsian], 45, 239-250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.45.02.0239
5. M. M. Student, H. V. Pokhmurska, and K. R. Zadorozhna, “Structure and wear resistance of VC-FeCr and VC-FeCrСо coatings obtained by supersonic flame spraying,” Mater. Sci., 54, No. 1, 22-29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-018-0152-9
6. V. Hutsaylyuk, M. Student, V. Posuvailo, O. Student, V. Hvozdets’kyi, P. Maruschak, and V. Zakiev, “The role of hydrogen in the formation of oxide-ceramic layers on aluminum alloys during their plasma-electrolytic oxydation,” J. of Mat. Res. and Tech., 14, 1682-1696 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.082
7. M. S. Stechyshyn, N. M. Stechyshyna, O. V. Dykha, A. V. Martynyuk, V. V. Liukhovets, and M. V. Lukyanyuk, “Corrosion-mechanical wear of nitrided steels in acidic medium,” Mater. Sci., 58, No. 5, 597-601 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00704-3
8. V. P. Babak, N. M. Fialko, V. V. Shchepetov, S. D. Kharchenko, Ya. M. Hladkyi, and S. S. Bys, “Self-lubricating glass composite nanocoatings,” Mater. Sci., 59, No. 1, 33-39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00740-z
9. V. M. Posuvailo, M. D. Klapkiv, M. M. Student, Y. Y. Sirak, and H. V. Pokhmurska, “Gibbs energy calculation of electrolytic plasma channel with inclusions of copper and copper oxide with Al-base,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. and Eng., 181, Is. 1 (2017). Article number 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/181/1/012045
10. S. Masahide, T. Nobuhiro, M. Yoritoshi, and K. Yuichiri, “Formation of nanocrystalline surface layers in various metallic materials by near surface severe plastic deformation,” Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 5, 145-152 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2003.10.015
11. T. Mazur, M. Slyotov, M. Mazur, V. Prokopiv, O Kinzerska, and O. Slyotov, “Features of cadmium chloride substrates with surface nanostructure,” Materials Today: Proc., 35, 626-629 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.112
12. B. N. Mordyuk, and G. I. Prokopenko, “Ultrasonic impact treatment – an effective method for nanostructuring the surface layers in metallic materials,” in: Handbook of Mechanical Nanostructuring, Vol. 2, Wiley, Verlag (2015), pp. 417-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527674947.ch17
13. A. V. Khomenko, “Severe plastic deformation: methods and mathematical models of nanomaterials formation,” J. of Physical Studies, 24, Is. 2, 1-20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.24.2001
14. M. O. Vasylyev, B. N. Mordyuk, S. M. Voloshko, and D. A. Lesyk, “Microstructure evaluation of the carbon steels during surface severe plastic deformation,” Prog. Phys. Met., 22, Is. 4, 562-618 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15407/ufm.22.04.562
15. K. Morshed-Behbahani, Z. Farchat, and A. Nasiri, “Effect of surface nanocrystallization on wear behaviour of steels: a review,” Materials, 17, Is. 7 (2024). Article number 1618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071618
16. V. Gurey, P. Maruschak, I. Hurey, V. Dzyura, T. Hurey, and W. Wojtowicz, “Dynamic analysis of the thermo-deformation treatment process of flat surfaces of machine parts,” J. Manuf. Mater. Proc., 7, Is. 3 (2023). Article number 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7030101
17. Y. Cheng, Z. Lin, S. Xie, X. Wang, and Y. Jiang, “Strengthening mechanism of abnormally enhanced fatigue ductility of gradient nanostructured 316L stainless steel,” Int. J. of Fatigue, 186 (2024). Article number 108415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108415
18. H. Nykyforchyn, V. Kyryliv, and O. Maksymiv, “Effect of nanostructurisation for structural steels on their wear hydrogen embittlement resistance,” Solid State Phenom., 225, 65-70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.225.65
19. H. Nykyforchyn, E. Lunarska, V. Kyryliv, and O. Maksymiv, “Influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of steels with the surface nanostructure,” in: Nanoplasmonics, Nano-Optics, Nanocomposites, and Surface Studies, Springer, Cham (2015), pp. 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18543-9_32
20. V. I. Kyryliv, B. P. Chaikovs’kyi, O. V. Maksymiv, A. V. Shal’ko, and P. Ya. Sydor, “Serviceability of 60KH2M roll steel with surface nanostructure,” Mater. Sci., 52, No. 6, 848-853 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-017-0030-x
21. H. Nykyforchyn, V. Kyryliv, O. Maksymiv, V. Kochubie, R. Boyko, and V. Dovhunyk, “Wear resistance of the surface nanocrystalline structure under an action of diethylene glycol medium,” Appl. Nanosci., 9, Is. 1, 1085-1090 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-018-0690-3
22. V. Kyryliv, V. Gurey, O. Maksymiv, I. Hurey, and Y. Kulyk, “Influence of the deformation mode on the force conditions of formation of the surface nanostructure of 40Kh steel,” Mater. Sci., 57, No. 3, 422-427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-021-00556-9
23. V. I. Kyryliv, V. I. Zakiev, and O. V. Maksymiv, “Change of the modulus of elasticity of the surface nanostructurted layer on U8 steel,” Mater. Sci., 58, No. 6, 795-800 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00732-z
24. E. E. Glikman, and R. E. Bruver, “Equilibrium segregation at the grain boundaries and intercrystalline cold brittleness of solid solutions,” Metallofizika [in Russian], 43, 42-43 (1972).
25. Y. Li, D. Raabe, M. Herbig, P.-P. Choi, S. Goto, A. Kostka, Y. Hiroshi, C. Borchers, and R. Kirchheim, “Segregation stabilizes nanocrystalline bulk steel with near theoretical strength,” Phys. Rev. Letter, 113, Is. 10 (2014). Article number 106104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.106104
26. W. Krous, and G. Nolze, “Powder cell – a program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns,” J. Appl. Crystallogr., 29, Is. 3, 301-303 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895014920
27. Powder Diffraction File Search Manual: Alphabetical Listing and Search Section of Frequently Encountered Phases, JCPDS, Philadelphia (1974).
28. J. E. Baker, “Secondary ion mass spectrometry,” in: Practical Materials Characterization, Springer, New York (2014), pp. 133-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9281-8_4
29. M. Berezhnitskaya, A. Paustovskii, S. Kirilenko, and Y. Gubin, “Determination of residual stresses in electric-spark deposited coatings,” Strength Mater., 35, Is. 6, 633-637 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STOM.0000013614.68800.d9
30. Y. Ochi, K. Masaki, T. Matsumura, and T. Sekino, “Effect of shot-peening treatment on high cycle fatigue property of ductile cast iron,” Int. J. of Fatigue, 23, Is. 5, 441-448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00110-9
31. K. Dai, and L. Shaw, “Analysis of fatigue resistance improvements via surface severe plastic deformation,” Int. J. of Fatigue, 30, Is. 8, 1398-1408 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.010
32. A. Campari, F. Ustolin, A. Alvaro, and N. Paltrinieri, “A review on hydrogen embrittlement and risk-based inspection of hydrogen technologies,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 48, Is. 90, 35316-35346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.293
33. N. I. I. Mansor, S. Abdullah, A. K. Ariffin, and J. Syarif, “A review of the fatigue failure mechanism of metallic materials under a corroded environment,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 42, 353-365 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.04.016