Determination of crack growth resistance characteristics of 15Kh2NMFA-A steel minispecimens

Keywords

reactor pressure vessel, fracture toughness (static crack growth resistance), specimen C(T)0.16T, Master-curve, reference temperature, critical temperature of brittlenes, 15Kh2NMFA-A steel.

Cite as

Zarazovskii М. М., Lukianenko K. М., Yaskovets Z. S., Shukaiev S. М., and Zemtsov М. P. Determination of crack growth resistance characteristics of 15Kh2NMFA-A steel minispecimens. Physicochemical Mechanics of Materials. 2025. 61(4), 053-060.

https://doi.org/10.15407/pcmm2025.04.053

Abstract

Reliable operation of a NPP requires ensuring the integrity of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in all operating conditions. RPV life assessment is based on calculations of brittle fracture resistance. The key RPV problem is metal degradation due to irradiation, which leads to embrittlement and reduced crack growth resistance. This process is monitored using surveillance specimens which are kept in the reactor and periodically removed for testing. Traditionally, determination of RPV crack growth resistance requires standard specimens testing, but the limited availability of irradiated material complicates this process. The use of miniature specimens is a relevant solution. New results were obtained for the fracture toughness testing of 15Kh2NMFA-A steel using miniature C(T)0.16T specimens. It is shown that the test results allow predicting the reference temperature of the steel according to Master-curve.

References

1. W. L Server, R. K Nanstad, and G. R. Odette, Use of Reactor Pressure Vessel Surveillance Materials for Extended Life Evaluations Using Power and Test Reactor Irradiations. (Accessed 03.26.2017)
2. V. Slugen, J. S. Veternikova, M. Domankova, M. Gavalec, J. Petzova, D. Slnek, M. Dzubinsky, O. Shugaylo, I. Szenthe, F. Gillemot, M. Zarazovskii, J. Lydman, R. Kopriva, S. Szavai, and O. Srba, “VVER long-term operation – A review based on the material studies results from past and ongoing EU-supported research projects,” Nuclear Eng. and Design, 435 (2025). Article number 113949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113949
3. M. Zarazovskii, Y. Dubyk, V. Filonov, V. Antonchenko, and O. Ishchenko, “Impact of the outer surface air cooling and WPS approaches on the brittle fracture margin of WWER RPV,” American Soc. of Mech. Eng., Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, 6 (2020). Article number v006t06a016. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2020-21736
4. M. Zarazovskii, V. Pistora, D. Lauerova, F. Obermeier, D. Mora, Y. Dubyk, T. Bolinder, C. Cueto-Felgueroso, S. Szavai, J. Dudra, O. C. Garrido, C. Blain, M. Puustinen, J. Katsuyama, B. R. Bass, P. T. Williams, and O. Shugailo, “State-of-the-art of WPS in RPV PTS analysis,” American Soc. of Mech. Eng., Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, 1 (2022). Article number V001T01A083. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2022-83699
5. USA ASTM E399-22. Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken (2022).
6. USA ASTM Standard E1820. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. ASTM International. West Conshohocken (2011).
7. O. T. Tsyrulnyk, O. Z. Student, O. I. Zvirko, D. O. Demianchuk, and O. I. Venhryniuk, “Assessment of hydrogen embrittlement of operated pipe steel using the J-integral method,” Mater. Sci., 59, No. 6, 694-701(2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-024-00830-6
8. M. M. Zarazovskyi, K. M. Lukiyanenko, V. P. Yasnii, and S. M. Shukaev, “Methodology for determining the metal crack resistance characteristics on half-size Charpy specimens at cryogenic temperatures,” Mechanics and Advanced Technologies, 8, Is. 3 (102), 246-255 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20535/2521-1943.2024.8.3(102).306592
9. K. Yoshimoto, T. Hirota, H. Sakamoto, T. Sugihara, S. Sakaguchi, and T. Oumaya, “Applicability of miniature C(T) specimen to evaluation of fracture toughness for reactor pressure vessel steel,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf. American Soc. of Mech. Eng. (2013). Article number V06BT06A056. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2013-97840
10. D. Jiang, P. Spätig, and H.-P. Seifert, “Effect of material inhomogeneity on constraint loss measured with subsized C (T) fracture specimens of a reactor pressure vessel steel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 588 (2024). Article number 154801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154801
11. M. Sánchez, S. Cicero, and S. Arrieta, “Literature review on testing of mini-CT specimen to characterize the ductile-to-brittle transition range and the upper shelf regime,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf. American Soc. of Mech. Eng. (2023). Article number V001T01A032. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2023-105596
12. M. Scibetta, E. Lucon, and E. Van Walle, “Optimum use of broken Charpy specimens from surveillance programs for the application of the master curve approach,” Int. J. Fract., 116, No 3, 231-244 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020165900918
13. USA ASTM E1921-17a. Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range. West Conshohocken (2017).
14. K. Wallin, “Fracture toughness transition curve shape for ferritic structural steels,” in Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, ed. by S. H. Teoh, K. H. Lee,Springer, Dordrecht (1991), pp. 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3650-1_10
15. K. Wallin, T. Planman, M. Valo, and R. Rintamaa, “Applicability of miniature size bend specimens to determine the master curve reference tem¬perature T0,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68, 1265-1296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00020-0
16. K. Wallin, Master Curve Analysis of Ductile to Brittle Transition Region Fracture Toughness Round Robin Data: The “Euro” Fracture Toughness Curve. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (1998).
17. Use of Fracture Toughness Test Data to Establish Reference Temperature for Pressure Retai¬ning Materials. Code Case N-629. Section IX, Division 1. AMSE, New York (1999).
18. Use of Fracture Toughness Test Data to Establish Reference Temperature for Pressure Retaining Materials Other Than Bolting for Class 1 Vessels. Code Case N-631. Section III, Division 1. AMSE, New York (1999).
19. JEAC 4216-2011. Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature T0 of Ferritic Steels. The Japan Electric Association (2011).
20. IAEA-TRS-429. Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2005).
21. IAEA-TECDOC-1631. Master Curve Approach to Monitor Fracture Toughness of Reactor Pressure Vessels in Nuclear Power Plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2009).
22. J. Tlatlik, Verification of the master curve concept (ASTM E1921) for the weld of a German RPV steel at various loading rates, Int. Conf. on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (Berlin/Potsdam, Germany, July 10-15, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108998
23. M. Laot, V. M. Pereira, T. Bakker, E. d’Agata, O. Martin, and M. Kolluri, “Investigation of irradiation hardening and effectiveness of post-irradiation annealing on the recovery of tensile properties of VVER-1000 realistic welds irradiated in the LYRA-10 experiment,” Metals, 14, Is. 8 (2024). Article number 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14080887
24. FRACTESUS Deliverable D6.9. Fracture Mechanics Testing of Irradiated RPV Steels by Means of Sub-Sized Specimens. Testing Protocols and Reporting Formats (2021).
25. Standard Г-7-002-86. Standards for Calculating the Strength of Equipment and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Plants [in Russian], Energoatomizdat, Moscow (1989).
26. Standard НАЕК 177:2033. Methodology for Assessing the brittle strength of Reactor Vessels [in Ukrainian], Energoatom, Kyiv (2023).
27. Unified Procedure for Lifetime Assessment of Components and Piping in WWER NPPs (VERLIFE) (2008).